• b) Identify and map all lands that have been archaeologically assessed and reviewed for their archaeological potential (including areas which no longer have cultural heritage value or interest, and properties that require further archaeological assessment). The proponent will be required to obtain data from MHSTCI.

• c) Re-evaluate the current archaeological potential model and its performance and recommend improvements.

• d) Provide a rationale and explanation of the methodology and criteria of the archaeological potential model.

• e) Update the model and mapping in accordance with their archaeological potential (high, and low) based on the criteria established in the study, not limited to the following:

  • Environmental factors

  • Previous/existing and new knowledge of pre-contact and post-contact Indigenous history

  • Previous/existing and new knowledge of non-Indigenous Historical Settlements, Sites, and Transportation Routes

  • Previous archaeological assessments

  • Known archaeological sites, archaeologically sensitive areas, and site leads

  • Archaeological integrity of properties based on previous ground disturbances from modern development activities

• f) Recommend procedures for maintaining mapping and databases of archaeological potential and locations where something of significance has been discovered or when an area has been assessed to no longer contain cultural heritage value or interest.

• g) Produce a GIS-based model with mapping that permits the identification of individual properties and is compatible with the City of Windsor GIS system. (The City of Windsor uses ArcGIS geographic information system software [ArcGIS Pro as well as the current ArcGIS software]). The City has adopted the UTM-NAD83, Zone 17, meters, as its standard in order to provide a common denominator for systems data. All geographic data shall be provided to the City of Windsor in ArcGIS shapefile format.)

7.2.4 IMPLEMENTATION

a) Review the current Implementation Manual and determine its effectiveness. Update and recommend appropriate policies and procedures for the management of archaeological resources in various contexts and scenarios, through current archaeological standards/practices and in consultation with stakeholders. Including but not limited to the following implementation to be proposed:

For Municipal Implementation:

• Municipal staff assessing the requirement for archaeological reviews in the land use planning process or for permit/development applications. Develop standard/template language that can be employed by municipal staff in the development review process. Procedures must be provided for all types of Planning Act, Ontario Heritage Act and Building Permit (both construction and demolition) applications, with consideration for applications located in areas of high archaeological potential with varying levels of past disturbances and proposed impact scenarios. These scenarios are not limited to: development