4. Enhance protocols for managing and documenting dynamic security plans (design effectiveness) | Overall rating: Low | ||
---|---|---|---|
Impact: | Low | Likelihood: | Likely |
Observation:When reviewing the resource/security planning processes we noted that:
| |||
Implication:The City may not be able to carry out necessary security arrangements in an event when a security service provider under-performs or is unable to deliver for any reason. | |||
Recommendation:Management should formalize the the security planning process by considering the following:
| |||
Management action plan | |||
a) A report to the council dealing with security is forthcoming. Administration will be seeking council direction, including the option to establish a centralized corporate security division. Although management agrees with the principle of the recommendation, the responsible party for corporate security is still to be determined. Subsequent to the Council direction the remaining action plans or risk acceptance will be determined. | Responsible party: | Senior Manager, Facilities | |
Due date: | December 31, 2020 | ||
b) In the event that the contracted security vendor was unable, or unwilling to provide services, the Corporation would use emergency and sole source procedures, outlined in the Purchasing By-Law, to hire another security guard service until a permanent solution can be implemented. | Responsible party: | Senior Manager, Facilities | |
Due date: | Complete |