(d) public transportation service can be provided.

EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR A NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PATTERN

• 6.3.2.5 At the time of submission, the proponent shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Municipality that a proposed residential development within an area having a Neighbourhood development pattern is:
  
  
  1. feasible having regard to the other provisions of this Plan, provincial legislation, policies and appropriate guidelines and support studies for uses:
     
     
     1. within or adjacent to any area identified on Schedule C: Development Constraint Areas and described in the Environment chapter of this Plan;
     2. adjacent to sources of nuisance, such as noise, odour, vibration and dust;
     3. within a site of potential or known contamination;
     4. where traffic generation and distribution is a provincial or municipal concern; and
     5. adjacent to heritage resources.
        
        
  2. in keeping with the goals, objectives and policies of any secondary plan or guideline plan affecting the surrounding area;
     
     
  3. compatible with the surrounding area in terms of scale, massing, height, siting, orientation, setbacks, parking and amenity areas;
     
     
  4. provided with adequate off street parking;
     
     
  5. capable of being provided with full municipal physical services and emergency services; and
     
     
  6. facilitating a gradual transition from Low Profile residential development to Medium and/or High profile development and vice versa, where appropriate.

EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR AN UNDEVELOPED AREA DEVELOPMENT PATTERN

• 6.3.2.6 At the time of submission, the proponent shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Municipality that a proposed residential development within an area having a Undeveloped Area development pattern is: