Risk Analysis:

There are two main risks to consider in discussing the implementation of new language;

Reputational challenges may occur as Windsor has set itself up as a front runner in animal rights, being one of the first communities to enact a time limit on outdoor tethering. The risks associated with not changing the by-law language include a negative public perception of the city’s choice. Brining this issue forward without some type of change enacted could have a detrimental reputational impact. However, this risk is considered low as it would not likely result in a large enough decline to create a significant impact.

The other potential risk lies in the difficulty of enforcing a by-law of this nature. If Council chooses to enact this type of language, it must be effectively enforced or the City will inevitably receive complaints about ineffective practice. In order to enforce appropriately it is necesary to create changes which allow for a greater level of enforcement as well as protect against different challenges that may be brought forward by the public through litigation. The risk, though it is considered to be ‘low’ lies in the City being portrayed as not providing the highest level of customer service possible.

Financial Matters:

The financial impacts of adding extreme weather language are minimal, as the Humane Society has agreed to enforce the changes to the Keeping of Animals By-law as they have done in the past. Any costs associated with informing the public of these changes are mitigated by using existing methods information dissemination including press releases and various social media outlets. Any cost associated with this change will stem from potential legal costs. A higher level of protections and provisions may result in a higher level of enforcement which leads to the potential for legal challenges. These challenges would be defended by the city’s internal legal team, but may result in costs related to litigation.

Consultations:

Bylaw Enforcement

The Windsor Essex County Humane Society

Conclusion:

The City of Windsor holds animal welfare in high regard and there are a number of protections in place for domestic household animals in the City through our own by-laws, as well as provincial and federal legislation. The PAWS Act has provided more in-depth language than it’s predecessor relating to animals in distress in motor vehicles and provide for Provincial Inspectors which allow for response and emergency call-out capabilities. Any changes to the PAWS Act provincially would be actively enforced by these officers, enabling the highest level of responsiveness and care to all animals within the City of Windsor.