DIBC’s efforts rely on a deficient technical report issued by Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) in 2012. At the time back in May 2013 when the decision was being deliberated by the Snyder administration, I sent a letter outlining my objections which include:

All these objections remain operative.

Furthermore, as you are no doubt aware the DIBC has been corporate actor that has demonstrated a level of disregard for its host communities as well as a willingness to break the rules and regulations on both sides of the border. This has engendered public distrust of the DIBC that is justified. We all wish this to be different but that takes concerted effort and meaningful actions to mend this relationship. Putting the public at risk of exposure to hazardous materials that could be toxic, radioactive, flammable, poisonous, or explosive would be choosing corporate profits rather than public safety. This is an unacceptable risk when the status quo protects the public and other businesses.

I urge to you to uphold the well thought out decision of the previous administration and reject the DIBC’s request.

I appreciate your time and attention to this issue. Please feel free to contact me if you have questions or concerns.

Sincerely,

Brian Masse, Member of Parliament (Windsor West)

NDP Innovation, Science, and Economic Development Critic