combinations of several techniques like amplified playback of taped distress calls, hazing with loud noises, using a bird in effigy, introducing a predator response such as using a trained dog, or treat grass with foul tasting "repellents". Albeit effective, these techniques are labour intensive and are relatively short lived requiring repeated and continual effort. They also may inadvertently impact the public as these are techniques are meant to startle. Several contractors are available for this type of work however due to the fact that these parks typically do not have dedicated staff position this control measure would require contracted resources. These control techniques also require permit by the CWS. This control measure is NOT suggested for consideration.
3) Fecal Matter Removal
In the absences of an efficient option to control geese, managing the mess left behind may be a consideration. The Parks Operations and Horticulture Departments currently do not have the staff or equipment to deal with routine cleaning of over 75 kilometers of recreational trails and sidewalks at 14 park locations with pond features.
Parks does operate a seasonal mobile power wash crew that responds to in-park and SERT needs, as well as contracts with private mobile power wash contractors who may respond to particular goose poop situations. Droppings on manicured turf areas do eventually get dispersed with lawn cutting operations.
It is conceivable that parks with trails and sidewalks adjacent to pond or wetland features could benefit from the placement of a single self propelled sweeper and operator who could be tasked with routine cleaning seasonally and as required. This program would not guarantee "soil" free sidewalks and trails but would certainly address accumulation, potential problem areas and an expectation for level of service. This would not benefit turf areas.
This control measure IS suggested for consideration.
RISK ANALYSIS:
Populations of Canada Goose from a park occupancy perspective have little ability to put the public or parks staff at risk. These populations do impact aesthetic and are nuisance issues reducing the enjoyment of parks in general from the presents of fecal matter. It could be argued that fecal matter, particularly in concentration has the potential contaminate water ways, public beaches and be transferred to individuals if consumed through poor hygiene or accidental contamination of food.